2 applications named BABLU JI
| Application | Class | Applicant | Filed | Advertised | Opposition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6237184BABLU JI | 30Staples, spices and confectionery | Proprietor of Bablu Ji | 28 December 2023 | No. 227127 July 2026 | openuntil 27 November 2026 |
| 5585995BABLU JI | 43Food services and accommodation | Proprietor of Bablu Ji | 27 August 2022 | No. 21518 April 2024 | closed8 August 2024 |
Goods and services claimed
Class 30: Staples, spices and confectionery · application 6237184
SPICES
Proposed to be used · Mumbai office · full journal entry
Class 43: Food services and accommodation · application 5585995
HOTEL AND RESTAURANT
Proposed to be used · Mumbai office · full journal entry
Can I use or register "BABLU JI"?
For the same or related goods, probably not. In class 30 (staples, spices and confectionery) and class 43 (food services and accommodation), a new application for an identical or confusingly similar name is likely to be objected to by the Registry under Section 11 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, or opposed by the earlier applicant. Closely related classes, such as class 29 (meat, dairy and processed food), class 32 (beverages, non-alcoholic), class 35 (advertising, business and retail) and class 31 (fresh produce and agriculture), carry the same risk.
For unrelated goods, often yes. The same word can be registered by different owners in different classes when the goods are unrelated and the earlier mark is not well known. "BABLU JI" appears in 2 classes; the other 43 may still be open, subject to a search.
A small change rarely helps. Adding a word, changing a letter or using a logo does not avoid conflict on its own: marks are compared as a whole, by look, sound and idea. We already see 3 similar names in the same classes (below).
Similar names in the journal
- BABLUcontains the name · class 7 (Machines and motors) · Individual applicant (S. S.)
- BABLU KABAB SHOPsimilar spelling · class 43 (Food services and accommodation) · Proprietor of Bablu Kabab Shop
- BABLU SWEETSsimilar spelling · class 30 (Staples, spices and confectionery) · Bablu Sweets
- BABLU CAR WORLDsimilar spelling · class 35 (Advertising, business and retail) · Proprietor of Bablu Car World
- BABLU SAGAR FOODsimilar spelling · class 30 (Staples, spices and confectionery) · Proprietor of Bablu Sagar Food
- (BABLU) (BABLU) logosimilar spelling · class 21 (Household and kitchenware) · Individual applicant (M. T.)
Matched by spelling and containment across every issue since August 2021. Our free report and Brand Watch also check sounds-alike names.
Questions about BABLU JI
Is BABLU JI a registered trademark?
BABLU JI has been applied for and advertised in the Trade Marks Journal (2 applications, latest on 27 July 2026). Advertisement means the Registry accepted the application; it is registered only if no opposition succeeds within four months of the journal date. The journal does not record the later outcome, so check the live register before relying on it.
Who applied for the BABLU JI trademark?
As advertised: Proprietor of Bablu Ji.
Can I register a trademark similar to BABLU JI?
Not for the same or related goods in class 30, class 43: a confusingly similar name is likely to be refused or opposed. For unrelated goods it may be possible after a search. Ask for a free availability report before you file.
What does "advertised" mean? Read trademark status meanings, how long registration takes and how to run a trademark search.
Source and limits. Built from the Trade Marks Journal published by the Registrar of Trade Marks (a public record), issues from August 2021 onwards, as advertised and subject to transcription errors. The journal shows that an application was accepted and advertised; it does not show what happened afterwards (registration, opposition, withdrawal or abandonment), applications not yet advertised, or marks advertised before August 2021, so this is not the live register status. Applicants may ask for a correction or removal by writing to mehak@trademarkindia.pro. Information only, not legal advice and not a solicitation.